You are on the test server. Data may be incomplete/incorrect.
2021
Off-setting Herbicide Resistance: Future Weed Control Options for Missouri Soybean Production
Category:
Sustainable Production
Keywords:
Lead Principal Investigator:
Kevin Bradley, University of Missouri
Co-Principal Investigators:
Mandy Bish, University of Missouri
Project Code:
436-21
Contributing Organization (Checkoff):
Institution Funded:
Brief Project Summary:
This project focuses on new weed management strategies.
Information And Results
Project Summary

This project focuses on new weed management strategies.

Project Objectives

Evaluate non-chemical control methods for integration with herbicides to manage weeds in soybean.

Project Deliverables

1. Determine the effectiveness of at-harvest week seed control tactics on waterhemp.
2. Determine the optimum cereal rye seeding rates for suppression of waterhemp emergence.
3. Determine the feasibility and effectiveness of the Seed Terminator for control of problematic weeds in Missouri soybean fields.

Progress Of Work

Updated April 27, 2021:
This project involves the evaluation of non-chemical control methods for integration into an overall weed management
program. Emphasis is on waterhemp, and a subset of the work was conducted on Missouri soybean fields. In 2020, the team concluded a 3-year evaluation of fall-seeded cereal rye, which was sown at 30, 50, 70, 90, or 110 lbs/acre, to suppress early season waterhemp emergence. Soybean was planted into the non-terminated cereal rye. Findings
include:
• Cereal rye planted at 50 lbs/acre resulted in comparable levels of early season waterhemp suppression to the higher seeding rates.
• Cereal rye seeded at 30 lbs/acre resulted in less consistent suppression.
• Soybean stand and yield were similar regardless of the cereal rye seeding rate.

Additional ongoing objectives of this project focus on minimizing the amount of viable waterhemp seed that returns to the soil. The Seed Terminator™ was tested in four mid-Missouri soybean fields in 2019 and three in 2020. The machine is a multi-stage hammer mill that is integrated into a commercial combine. The mills rotate at 2,500 rotations per minute to grind weed seed. Questions being addressed include:
• What percentage of waterhemp seed passes into the Seed Terminator™?
• How effective is the machine at rendering seed nonviable?
• How does the implement affect fuel usage and engine load of the combine?

Preliminary results indicate that during soybean harvest approximately one third of waterhemp seed returned to the soil due to header loss. Of waterhemp seed that successfully passed through to the thresher, 72% made it into the Seed Terminator™. Approximately 92% of waterhemp seed that entered the Seed Terminator™ was damaged. On average, combine fuel consumption was 4.1 gal/hour greater and engine load was 17.6% higher when the Seed Terminator™ was engaged. Data analysis of the 2020 samples continues.

Finally, a side-by-side comparison is being conducted to evaluate the effects of different non-chemical control options on a dense stand of multi-resistant waterhemp in soybean. At soybean harvest in 2019, the Seed Terminator™ and narrow windrow burning were implemented, and cereal rye was planted in a subset of those treated plots. Waterhemp density counts were conducted in the spring of 2020. Plots with cereal rye and the Seed Terminator™ treatment had the least waterhemp emerge in the spring. This objective is being repeated with the addition of weed electrocution as another non-chemical treatment. Waterhemp density counts will be conducted in the spring of 2021.

Final Project Results

Benefit To Soybean Farmers

Research results will provide Missouri producers with timely knowledge of non-chemical options that can be integrated with herbicides for effective weed management.

The United Soybean Research Retention policy will display final reports with the project once completed but working files will be purged after three years. And financial information after seven years. All pertinent information is in the final report or if you want more information, please contact the project lead at your state soybean organization or principal investigator listed on the project.